 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>TJ Kelly - Web design, development, SEO, Social Media, Wordpress &#187; Search Engine Optimization</title> <atom:link href="http://www.tjkelly.com/category/search-engine-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.tjkelly.com</link> <description>Portfolio of web designer/developer TJ Kelly. I build beautiful, standards-based websites &#38; focus on SEO/social media marketing</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:54:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>Timestamp in Google Results</title><link>http://www.tjkelly.com/timestamp-in-google-results/</link> <comments>http://www.tjkelly.com/timestamp-in-google-results/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:14:13 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Search Results]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Timestamp]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tjkelly.com/?p=1032</guid> <description><![CDATA[Update: Apparently I'm late to the game here. I've never noticed a timestamp before, but they tell me that it indicates the time of your last visit. Does it sometimes also show date? When did Google add a timestamp into their results?Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/twitters-seo-mistake/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Twitter&#039;s SEO Mistake'>Twitter&#039;s SEO Mistake</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/tj-kelly-my-google-identity/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: &quot;TJ Kelly&quot; &#8211; My Google Identity'>&quot;TJ Kelly&quot; &#8211; My Google Identity</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/on-googles-changes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: On Google&#039;s Changes'>On Google&#039;s Changes</a></li></ol>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.tjkelly.com/timestamp-in-google-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>&quot;TJ Kelly&quot; &#8211; My Google Identity</title><link>http://www.tjkelly.com/tj-kelly-my-google-identity/</link> <comments>http://www.tjkelly.com/tj-kelly-my-google-identity/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:04:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tjkwebdesign.com/?p=315</guid> <description><![CDATA[A while back, I read a Newsweek article about managing your "Google Identity." It got me thinking about my search engine persona. People use search engines to answer questions. The question "who is TJ Kelly?" is no different.Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/google-vs-twitter/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google vs. Twitter'>Google vs. Twitter</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/on-googles-changes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: On Google&#039;s Changes'>On Google&#039;s Changes</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/google-facebook-microsoft-myspace/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google vs. Facebook vs. Microsoft vs. MySpace'>Google vs. Facebook vs. Microsoft vs. MySpace</a></li></ol>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.tjkelly.com/tj-kelly-my-google-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Twitter&#039;s SEO Mistake</title><link>http://www.tjkelly.com/twitters-seo-mistake/</link> <comments>http://www.tjkelly.com/twitters-seo-mistake/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 03:18:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Canonicalization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tjkwebdesign.com/?p=471</guid> <description><![CDATA[Twitter's mobile version (m.twitter.com) is showing up in Google search results. This could mean a HUGE canonicalization/SEO problem for Twitter. There's been talk of Twitter pages taking a big hit in Google SERPs lately. Is this part of the reason?Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/using-twitter-for-seo/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Using Twitter for SEO'>Using Twitter for SEO</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/on-googles-changes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: On Google&#039;s Changes'>On Google&#039;s Changes</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-an-seo-killer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is DiggBar an SEO-killer?'>Is DiggBar an SEO-killer?</a></li></ol>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.tjkelly.com/twitters-seo-mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Update: DiggBar NOT an SEO-killer</title><link>http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-not-seo-killer/</link> <comments>http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-not-seo-killer/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Digg Bar]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tjkwebdesign.com/?p=247</guid> <description><![CDATA[Digg&#8217;s VP of Engineering, John Quinn, just posted to the company&#8217;s official blog, weighing on the DiggBar vs. SEO question. The most important thing he said (from an SEO perspective) is, &#8220;Prior to launching the DiggBar, we reached out to Google and SEO experts to ensure we adhered to the leading best practices&#8230;&#8221; That is [...]Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-an-seo-killer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is DiggBar an SEO-killer?'>Is DiggBar an SEO-killer?</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/using-twitter-for-seo/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Using Twitter for SEO'>Using Twitter for SEO</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/on-politics-briefly/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: On Politics (briefly)'>On Politics (briefly)</a></li></ol>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-not-seo-killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>12</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Is DiggBar an SEO-killer?</title><link>http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-an-seo-killer/</link> <comments>http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-an-seo-killer/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:34:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Digg Bar]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tjkwebdesign.com/?p=203</guid> <description><![CDATA[Reading about and playing with the new DiggBar, I immediately wonder if it will have an impact on SEO. Previously, Digg did authors a huge favor by linking to their site with whatever keywords they submitted thrown into an H1, all from a heavyweight source (and, to my memory, they did do-follow these links.. right?). Now...Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-not-seo-killer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Update: DiggBar NOT an SEO-killer'>Update: DiggBar NOT an SEO-killer</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/using-twitter-for-seo/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Using Twitter for SEO'>Using Twitter for SEO</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/twitters-seo-mistake/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Twitter&#039;s SEO Mistake'>Twitter&#039;s SEO Mistake</a></li></ol>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-an-seo-killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Paradox of Content</title><link>http://www.tjkelly.com/the-paradox-of-content/</link> <comments>http://www.tjkelly.com/the-paradox-of-content/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:59:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tjkwebdesign.com/?p=161</guid> <description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, I wrote about &#8220;the catch-22 of relevance&#8221; and mentioned how SEO relevance ultimately comes down to a website&#8217;s content&#8230; &#8220;It&#8217;s no easy task to provide lots of great, high-quality content week in and week out. But that’s what it boils down to.. providing great content.&#8221; But content is a tricky thing. What [...]Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/the-catch-22-of-relevance/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Catch-22 of Relevance'>The Catch-22 of Relevance</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-not-seo-killer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Update: DiggBar NOT an SEO-killer'>Update: DiggBar NOT an SEO-killer</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/designing-spring-break/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Designing Spring Break'>Designing Spring Break</a></li></ol>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.tjkelly.com/the-paradox-of-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>On Google&#039;s Changes</title><link>http://www.tjkelly.com/on-googles-changes/</link> <comments>http://www.tjkelly.com/on-googles-changes/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:50:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tjkwebdesign.com/?p=167</guid> <description><![CDATA[Google just announced that they&#8217;ve made some &#8220;upgrades&#8221; to their results pages: &#8220;more and better search refinements&#8221; (those &#8220;related searches&#8221; terms at the bottom of the search results page) and &#8220;longer snippets.&#8221; I see two interesting developments here. 1) It seems that Google just opened the door for SEOs to exploit &#8220;related searches&#8221; terms. On [...]Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/twitters-seo-mistake/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Twitter&#039;s SEO Mistake'>Twitter&#039;s SEO Mistake</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/google-vs-twitter/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google vs. Twitter'>Google vs. Twitter</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/tj-kelly-my-google-identity/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: &quot;TJ Kelly&quot; &#8211; My Google Identity'>&quot;TJ Kelly&quot; &#8211; My Google Identity</a></li></ol>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.tjkelly.com/on-googles-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Catch-22 of Relevance</title><link>http://www.tjkelly.com/the-catch-22-of-relevance/</link> <comments>http://www.tjkelly.com/the-catch-22-of-relevance/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:57:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tjkwebdesign.com/?p=163</guid> <description><![CDATA[In the world of Search Engine Optimization, only one thing really matters: relevance. It sounds simple, but how can you achieve relevance? Actually, you can&#8217;t. Either your website&#8217;s content is relevant, or it&#8217;s not. Of course, relevance is entirely subjective. And as  the saying goes, &#8220;one man&#8217;s trash is another man&#8217;s treasure.&#8221; So one could [...]Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/the-paradox-of-content/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Paradox of Content'>The Paradox of Content</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-not-seo-killer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Update: DiggBar NOT an SEO-killer'>Update: DiggBar NOT an SEO-killer</a></li><li><a href='http://www.tjkelly.com/diggbar-an-seo-killer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is DiggBar an SEO-killer?'>Is DiggBar an SEO-killer?</a></li></ol>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.tjkelly.com/the-catch-22-of-relevance/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 28/162 queries in 0.577 seconds using disk
Object Caching 874/1674 objects using disk

Served from: www.tjkelly.com @ 2010-09-09 13:26:44 -->